Solana vs Ethereum Statistics 2026: TPS, Fees, TVL & Users

Solana processes far more transactions per second than Ethereum's base layer -- roughly 1,000-4,000 real TPS versus Ethereum's ~15 -- at a fee well under a cent versus $2-$10 for the same swap on Ethereum mainnet, while Ethereum leads on total value locked and market cap by several times over. In short: Solana wins on speed, cost, and raw activity; Ethereum wins on value locked, security, and market size. Here is the full side-by-side.
The two chains have made opposite architectural bets. Ethereum positions itself as a secure, decentralized settlement layer and pushes performance to Layer 2 networks; Solana bets on a single high-performance chain, trading some decentralization for speed. That divergence shows up directly in the numbers below.
| Metric | Solana | Ethereum (L1) |
|---|---|---|
| Real-world TPS | ~1,000-4,000 | ~15 |
| Theoretical / peak TPS | 65,000 (peak ~6,284) | ~15-30 |
| Typical fee per transaction | well under $0.01 (~$0.0005-$0.005) | ~$2-$10 (swap); ~$0.10-$0.50 on L2 |
| Block time | ~0.4s | ~12s |
| Weekly active addresses | ~29.84 million | ~2.46 million |
| DeFi TVL | ~$5.5-12 billion | |
| Market cap | ~$47 billion | several times Solana (~4-5x) |
| Design focus | Monolithic high performance | Settlement layer + L2s |
Sources: Chainspect, Nansen via MEXC, Eco, DefiLlama, and CoinMarketCap. Figures are mid-2026 snapshots; prices, TVL, and market cap move constantly.
This is Solana's clearest lead. Real-world sustained throughput on Solana runs roughly 1,000-4,000 TPS (live reading ~1,468, all-time peak ~6,284), against a theoretical ceiling of 65,000, per Chainspect. Ethereum's base layer processes about 15 TPS. That is a gap of roughly 100x at typical loads.
Ethereum's answer is Layer 2 -- rollups that batch transactions off-chain and settle to mainnet, adding more than 5,000 TPS in aggregate across all rollups, per Eco. That is the fairest way to read the comparison: Ethereum's ecosystem throughput is competitive, but it is spread across many separate rollups with fragmented liquidity, whereas Solana delivers its throughput on one unified chain. On the base layer itself the gap is stark -- Solana's block time is around 0.4 seconds versus Ethereum's ~12 seconds. For a deeper look at Solana's throughput, see our Solana transactions per second breakdown.
Fees are the second decisive gap. A Solana transaction costs well under a cent -- typically $0.0005-$0.005, with a Jupiter DEX swap around $0.001-$0.005 -- per Eco. The same Uniswap V3 swap costs $2-$10 on Ethereum mainnet, dropping to $0.10-$0.50 on a Layer 2 like Base or Arbitrum after the 2024 blob upgrade.
| Action | Solana | Ethereum L1 | Ethereum L2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEX swap | ~$0.001-$0.005 | ~$2-$10 | ~$0.10-$0.50 |
| Simple transfer | well under $0.01 | ~$1-$5 | ~$0.10-$0.50 |
Source: Eco. For small, everyday payments -- exactly the use case a crypto card serves -- Solana's flat, near-zero fee is the difference between a viable transaction and one where the fee swallows the payment. There is a counterintuitive twist worth flagging: despite charging a fraction of the fee, Solana out-earns Ethereum's L2s on total fee revenue, generating about $1.03 million in chain fees over a recent 24 hours versus roughly $182,000 for a basket of major L2s, per MEXC. It monetizes on sheer volume while L2s subsidize transactions to win market share -- cheaper per action, yet a larger fee pie.
Solana dominates on raw on-chain activity. In a representative early-2026 weekly snapshot from analytics firm Nansen (reported by MEXC), Solana logged about 29.84 million active addresses versus Ethereum's 2.46 million -- more than 10x.
| Chain | Weekly active addresses (2026) |
|---|---|
| Solana | ~29.84 million |
| Tron | ~8.74 million |
| BNB Chain | ~8.09 million |
| Bitcoin | ~2.73 million |
| Ethereum | ~2.46 million |
Source: Nansen via MEXC. One caveat that cuts against Solana here: these are address counts, not unique users, and Solana's near-zero fees make many-address usage patterns cheap, so the 10x lead overstates the human-user gap. Ethereum's higher fees, by contrast, discourage address churn, making its count a tighter proxy for real users. Still, by any activity measure Solana is among the busiest chains in crypto. See our Solana wallet statistics page for the wallets-vs-people nuance.
This is where Ethereum leads decisively. Ethereum's base layer holds roughly $78 billion in DeFi TVL, plus about $45 billion across its Layer 2s, for a combined ~$123 billion as of Q1 2026, per Eco. Solana's DeFi TVL sits around $5.5-12 billion depending on the aggregator -- roughly $5.5 billion on DefiLlama, nearer $9-12 billion on measures that also count derivatives collateral and liquid-staked positions. That spread is a definitional artifact, not a data dispute, and it is why a single "Solana TVL" figure should always carry its source. See our how many dApps on Solana page for the full ecosystem breakdown.
On market cap, Ethereum is several times larger than Solana -- on the order of 4-5x. SOL's market cap sits around $47 billion as of mid-2026 ($46.82 billion, rank #7, at a ~$80.58 price), per CoinMarketCap, while ETH trades several times higher. Ethereum's larger market cap and TVL reflect its longer track record, deeper institutional adoption, and role as the dominant settlement layer.
The comparison is not "which is better" but "better at what":
- Solana leads on: transactions per second, transaction fees, block time, active addresses, DEX volume, and consumer/payments use cases.
- Ethereum leads on: total value locked, market cap, decentralization and validator count, institutional adoption, and its role as a settlement layer for a large L2 ecosystem.
The trend through 2026 has been Solana closing the activity and developer-growth gap while Ethereum retains its lead in value locked and security. For payments specifically -- fast, cheap, high-volume, small-value transactions -- Solana's profile is the better fit, which is why it is the chain most crypto cards settle on.
For actually spending crypto, the stats that matter are speed and fees -- and that is exactly where Solana leads. This is not an abstract preference: building a card, the deciding factor is that a top-up is a small, frequent transaction, and on Ethereum's base layer a $2-$10 gas fee on a $20 load is a non-starter, while the same load on Solana costs a fraction of a cent and confirms before the app finishes animating. Ethereum's L2s narrow the fee gap but reintroduce fragmentation -- your stablecoins might sit on Arbitrum while the card wants them on Base -- whereas Solana keeps liquidity on one chain. A crypto debit card converts your SOL or stablecoins to fiat and loads a Visa or Mastercard; when settlement runs on Solana, top-ups clear in seconds for a fraction of a cent instead of waiting on a slow, pricier base layer. SolCard is built on Solana for this reason: deposit SOL or Solana-based stablecoins and spend at millions of merchants. Our Solana payments guide and how Solana Pay works explainer show how those TPS and fee numbers translate into real-world spending, and our how many people own Solana page covers the ownership side.
Yes, by a wide margin on the base layer. Solana sustains roughly 1,000-4,000 real-world TPS versus Ethereum's ~15, per Chainspect, and confirms blocks in about 0.4 seconds versus Ethereum's ~12. Ethereum adds throughput through Layer 2 rollups, but its base layer remains far slower than Solana.
Dramatically. A Solana transaction costs well under a cent -- typically $0.0005-$0.005 -- versus $2-$10 for a comparable DEX swap on Ethereum mainnet, per Eco -- often more than a thousandfold difference. Even on Ethereum Layer 2s, fees run about $0.10-$0.50, still far above Solana's fraction of a cent.
Yes. Ethereum's base layer holds roughly $78 billion in DeFi TVL (about $123 billion including its Layer 2s) versus Solana's ~$5.5-12 billion, per Eco and DefiLlama. Ethereum's broader L1+L2 ecosystem commands the majority of global DeFi TVL. Ethereum leads on value locked; Solana leads on activity and fees.
Solana, by a large margin on address counts. Solana logged about 29.84 million weekly active addresses versus Ethereum's 2.46 million in an early-2026 snapshot, per MEXC. Note these count addresses, not unique people, and Solana's low fees make high-address-count usage cheap.
For everyday payments, Solana's profile fits better: sub-second block times and sub-cent fees make small transactions economical, whereas Ethereum L1 fees can exceed the payment itself. This is why most crypto cards, including SolCard, settle on Solana. For high-value DeFi and institutional settlement, Ethereum's deeper liquidity and security are advantages.
- Chainspect -- Solana TPS, Max TPS, Block Time & TTF
- Eco -- Solana vs Ethereum: Fees, TPS, and DeFi Compared
- Nansen (via MEXC) -- Solana Weekly Active Addresses vs Other Chains
- MEXC -- Solana TPS: Theoretical Maximum vs. Real-World Performance
- MEXC -- Solana vs Ethereum L2s: 2026 Fundamental Analysis (TVL, Fee Revenue, Stablecoins)
- DefiLlama -- Solana DeFi TVL, Fees & Revenue
- CoinMarketCap -- Solana (SOL) Price & Market Cap




